LOGISTIC REGRESSION WITH ITEM RESPONSE THEORY (LRIRT): SENSITIVITY DETECTING DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING

Penulis

Kata Kunci:

Logistic Regression with IRT, differential item functioning, dif, bias

Abstrak

Analisis butir sangat penting pada tes untuk mendapatkan informasi awal layak atau tidaknya suatu tes digunakan dalam penilaian. Salah satu kriteria baiknya suatu butir yaitu tidak terjadi diskriminasi atau menguntung pada golongan dalam menjawab benar suatu butir. Hal ini disebut dengan perbedaan fungsi butir disebut differential item functioning (DIF). Tujuan penelitian ini, apakah metode LRIRT lebih sensitif mendeteksi DIF dengan 2000 responden daripada 200 responden. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu desain eksperimen, analisis yang digunakan two independent samples t-test. Data penelitian menggunakan hasil ujian nasional (UN) 2015. Hasil penelitian pertama,metode LRIRT lebih sensitif mendeteksi perbedaan fungsi butir (DIF) yang menggunakan 2000 responden daripada 200 responden. Kesimpulannya, metode LRIRT lebih sensitit deteksi DIF pada ukuran sampel 2000 daripada ukuran sampel 200

Biografi Penulis

Ahmad Rustam

<strong>Almufi Journal of Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation Education</strong><strong>AJMAEE</strong> published in June and December Special editions are also planned according to scope and needs. AJMAEE publishes research articles that have never been published before. Every article submitted to the editorial staff will be reviewed and researched by the editor for eligibility or publication without reducing the substance of the article.

Referensi

Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items. SAGE Publications Inc.

Crane, P. K., Belle, G. Van, & Larson, E. B. (2004). Test bias in a cognitive test : differential item functioning in the CASI. Statistics in Medicine, 23, 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1713

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: CBS college publishing.

Engelhard, G. (2009). Using Item Response Theory and Model–Data Fit to Conceptualize Differential Item and Person Functioning for Students With Disabilities. Educational and Psychological Measurement Volume, 69(4), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323240

Field, A. (2000). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Inc.

Gierl, M., Khalid, S. N., & Boughton, K. (1999). Gender Differential Item Functioning in Mathematics and Science : Prevalence and Policy Implications. In Improving Large-Scale Assessment in Education (pp. 1–25). Canada: Centre for Research in Applied Measurement and Evaluation University of Alberta Pap.

Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. California: SAGE Publications Inc.

He, Q., & Wheadon, C. (2008). The Effect of Sample Size on Item Parameter Estimation For The Partial Credit model. Centre for Education Research and Policy, (3644723).

Hulin, C. L., Lissak, R. I., & Drasgow, F. (1982). Recovery of Two- and Three-Parameter Logistic Item Characteristic Curves : A Monte Carlo Study. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(3), 249–260.

Ironson, G. H. (1983). Using Item Response Theory to Measure Bias”, in Application of Item Response Theory, ed. Ronald K. Hambleton. Vancouver: Educational Research Institute of Bristish Columbia.

Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in Mental Testing. New York: A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

Linacre, J. M. (2005). Rasch dichotomous model vs. One-parameter Logistic Model. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 19(3), 1032.

Loong, T. (2003). Understanding sensitivity and specificity with the right side of the brain. BMJ, 327, 716–719.

Mellenbergh, G. J. (1982). Contingency table models for assessing item bias, 7(2), 105–118.

Ong, Y. M. (2010). Understanding Differential Functioning By Gender in Mathematics Assessment. University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

Reise, S. P., & Yu, J. (1990). Parameter Recovery in the Graded Response Model Using MULTILOG. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(2), 133–144.

Wiberg, M. (2007). Measuring and Detecting Differential Item Functioning in Criterion-Referenced Licensing Test: A Theoretic Comparison of Methods. EM, (60).

Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing Measures : An Item Response Modeling Approach. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305050802007117

Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.

Yerushalmy, J. (1947). Statistical Problems in Assessing Methods of Medical Diagnosis, with Special Reference to X-Ray Techniques. Public Health Reports, 62(40), 1432–1449.

Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook of theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of human resources, research and evaluation, department of national defense.

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2021-06-21

Cara Mengutip

Rustam, A. (2021). LOGISTIC REGRESSION WITH ITEM RESPONSE THEORY (LRIRT): SENSITIVITY DETECTING DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING. Almufi Journal of Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation Education, 1(1), 51–57. Diambil dari https://almufi.com/index.php/AJMAEE/article/view/15

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama